Improving the rate of surgical normothermia in gynecologic surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To increase the rate of normothermia (core temperature ≥ 36 °C) in patients undergoing gynecologic surgery. METHODS: The rate of surgical normothermia was evaluated in a single institution. A two-phase quality improvement project was undertaken; Phase 1 included the use of intra-operative room temperature regulation and intra-operative patient warming and Phase 2 included pre-operative patient warming. Clinical characteristics, median temperatures, and rate of normothermia were abstracted for patients in each phase. Cohorts were compared using chi-square and t-tests. RESULTS: The project was performed in two phases, each with a historic and intervention cohort. There were 503 patients in the historical cohort and 636 patients in the intervention cohort in phase 1; there were 291 patients in the historical cohort and 259 patients in the intervention cohort for Phase 2. Patient characteristics and anesthetic type and duration did not differ between cohorts. After intra-operative temperature regulation and patient warming in Phase 1, significantly more patients achieved normothermia (79% versus 68%, P < 0.0001). However operating room staff were more likely to rate the temperature as very hot in 40% of cases post-intervention, compared to only 2% historically. In Phase 2, after the intervention of pre-warming patients, there was no difference in achieving normothermia, 78% versus 83%, P = 0.09. Staff had no statistical difference in personal comfort with the temperature, however did feel efforts were very effective more frequently, 7.7% historic versus 32.7% post-intervention, P < 0.0001. CONCLUSIONS: Quality improvement methodology can be applied to pre- and intra-operative decision making to improve rates of surgical patient normothermia.

Using an Electronic Perioperative Documentation Tool to Identify Returns to Operating Room (ROR) in a Tertiary Care Academic Medical Center.

BACKGROUND: The metric "Unplanned returns to operating room (ROR)" is being tracked in surgical quality dashboards; 70% of unplanned RORs may be related to surgical complications. With increasing regionalization of trauma and complex surgical care at tertiary care academic centers, it is unclear if a simple ROR metric is a valid assessment of surgical quality at such centers. METHOD: A real-time electronic tool was used to identify all RORs-planned and unplanned-in a high-volume, high-complexity academic surgical practice at Mayo Clinic-Rochester within 45 days of the index operation. Analysis by ROR type and indication was performed. RESULTS: During the analysis period (June 2014-February 2015) 44,031 operations were performed, with 5,552 subsequent RORs (13%). Of all RORs, 51% (n = 2,818) were planned staged returns, 29% (n = 1,589) were unrelated, 15% (n = 830) were unplanned and 6% (n = 315) were planned because of previous complications. Overall, unplanned reoperations were uncommon (n = 830, 2% of all operations). The most common indications for unplanned RORs included "other" (32%, n = 266), bleeding related (24%, n = 198) and wound complications (20%, n = 166). CONCLUSION: In a high-volume, high-complexity academic surgical practice, RORs occurred after 13% of cases. Unplanned returns were infrequent and usually were associated with complications; most RORs were planned staged or unrelated returns. A simple ROR metric that does not consider planned/unrelated returns is likely not a valid surgical quality measure. Electronic tools designed specifically to identify in real-time RORs, associated indication, and clinical validation should provide more reliable data for public reporting and quality improvement efforts.

Implementation of an intraoperative blood transport and storage initiative and its effect on reducing red blood cell and plasma waste.

BACKGROUND: The national waste rate for hospital-issued blood products ranges from 0% to 6%, with operating room-responsible waste representing up to 70% of total hospital waste. A common reason for blood product waste is inadequate intraoperative storage. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Our transfusion service database was used to quantify and categorize red blood cell (RBC) and fresh-frozen plasma (FFP) units issued for intraoperative transfusion that were wasted over a 27-month period. Two cohorts were created: 1) before implementation of a blood transport and storage initiative (BTSI)-RBC and plasma waste January 1, 2011-May 31, 2012; 2) after implementation of BTSI-RBC and plasma waste June 1, 2012, to March 31, 2013. The BTSI replaced existing storage coolers (8-hr coolant life span with temperature range of 1-10°C) with a cooler that had a coolant life span of 18 hours and a temperature range of 1 to 6°C and included an improved educational cooler placard and an alert mechanism in the electronic health record. Monthly median RBC and plasma waste and its associated cost were the primary outcomes. RESULTS: An intraoperative BTSI significantly reduced median monthly RBC (1.3% vs. 0.07%) and FFP (0.4% vs. 0%) waste and its associated institutional cost. The majority of blood product waste was due to an unacceptable temperature of unused returned blood products. CONCLUSION: An intraoperative BTSI significantly reduced median monthly RBC and FFP waste. The cost to implement this initiative was small, resulting in a significant estimated return on investment that may be reproducible in institutions other than ours.